« Enterasys Settlement: More Governance Reforms | Main | SEC Not Going to Fall for the Sky Jones Paintings Trick »

Daily Posts

May 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

About SLW

Events

Subscribe

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

U.S. Code

Code of Federal Regulations

Monday, October 20, 2003

20,000 Hours to Comply With SOX?

Anecdotal evidence of the immense cost of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley, particularly the internal controls provision in Section 404, is starting to surface as next year's deadlines grow nearer. According to this article in USA Today, the CEOs of Fortune 500 companies Affiliated Computer Services and Steelcase say it will take their companies 20,000 staff hours to comply, the equivalent of 10 people working full time for a year. Other companies such as Dell estimate that compliance will take closer to 5,000 hours.

As discussed here previously, the SEC's Final Rule regarding Section 404 estimated an average 383-hour workload per company, a figure that was raised from the SEC's original estimate of just 5 hours after strong comments such as this one from Intel's Cary Klafter advised the SEC that its had "underestimated the time and effort involved in complying with these rules by at least a factor of 100, if not a greater order of magnitude." The numbers in the USA Today article suggest that Klafter could have added another zero to the end of that prediction and still have been correct.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/214

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 20,000 Hours to Comply With SOX?:

» Today's links from ProfessorBainbridge.com
I wonder what Hugh Hewitt thinks about this? This is strangely addictive (link via Anthony). A very bad idea: A SOX II to tackle executive compensation. (Go here for my comp posts.) Update: Corp Law Blog is on the case, [Read More]

» Today's shareholder access question: What will it cost? from ProfessorBainbridge.com
As part of our continuing coverage of the SEC's shareholder access proposal, today's SEC question is # A.2:What would be the cost to companies if the Commission adopted proxy rules requiring companies to include security holder nominees in company proxy [Read More]

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group
The World Leader in Proxy Voting and Corporate Governance Services

Powered by Movable Type 3.36