« SLW Signing Off Through April 9 | Main | Investors Win First Arbitration Awards Directly Against Grubman »

Daily Posts

May 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

About SLW

Events

Subscribe

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

U.S. Code

Code of Federal Regulations

Tuesday, April 13, 2004

Time Warner May Face Sanctions for Non-Cooperation with SEC

The Washington Post, which first broke the AOL "questionable advertising revenue" story back in 2002, reported today that the SEC is preparing documents alleging that Time Warner Inc. booked more than $400 million in questionable advertising revenue following the company's January 2001 merger with America Online.

According to the article, the most prominent single item is a $400 million ad deal with the German company Bertelsmann AG. The article notes that in a recent SEC filing, Time Warner explained that "in the view of the [SEC's] Office of the Chief Accountant, the Company should have allocated some portion of the $400 million . . . as a reduction in the purchase price for Bertelsmann's interest in AOL Europe, rather than as advertising revenue. . . . The Company and its auditors continue to believe its accounting for these transactions is appropriate."

Also of note in the article is the ominous information from "people familiar with the probe" that the SEC is considering seeking financial sanctions against the company for allegedly failing to cooperate sufficiently with the investigation. According to an unnamed "government official familiar with the SEC's dealings with Time Warner," the company has been "dragging their feet and fighting every inch of the way, not only on the issues but on cooperation.... The commission has made it unmistakably clear that lack of cooperation has a cost."

As seen recently in the Banc of America ($10 million) and Lucent ($25 million) cases, perceived lack of cooperation can carry a steep price tag in settlement discussions with the SEC. If today's article is correct, it will be interesting to see what that price tag may be in this case.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/323

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group
The World Leader in Proxy Voting and Corporate Governance Services

Powered by Movable Type 3.36