WorldCom Update: SEC Sues Former WorldCom Accountant
Just when you thought that the WorldCom case was dead and buried, it appears that the SEC is still plugging along. Despite the fact that all of the key players in the fraud have now been prosecuted and sentenced (some, such as Betty Vinson, have actually already pleaded guilty, served their entire sentence and been released!) the SEC announced a new civil case against Mark Abide, the company's former director of property accounting.
The SEC announced that
The Commission's action against Abide is its seventh civil action related to the WorldCom fraud. The complaint filed today alleges from the first quarter of 2001 through the first quarter of 2002, Abide made, and directed others to make, improper accounting entries into WorldCom's depreciable asset accounts in order to conceal improperly capitalized expenses. In January and February 2002, while the fraud was being carried out by Abide and others, Abide sold 6,728 shares of WorldCom stock (99% of the WorldCom stock he owned), avoiding losses of nearly $58,000.
Abide has agreed to settle the matter by consenting to pay $128,806: $57,947 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest of $12,912 and an insider trading civil money penalty of $57,947. Abide also has agreed to be suspended from practicing before the Commission as an accountant with the right to request his reinstatement after five years.
Oddly enough, Abide appears to be the only one of the seven SEC defendants to date (Ebbers, Sullivan, David Myers, Buddy Yates, Vinson, and Troy Normand) who will actually pay a fine to the SEC. The SEC said yesterday that Sullivan and Yates are "unable to pay" the fines/disgorgement previously imposed upon them (Sullivan already forked over his sweet house in Boca Raton as part of the securities class action settlement), and that no such penalties were imposed on Vinson and Normand because they also were unable to pay anything. The SEC had previously indicated that the same was true of Myers. Ebbers' SEC settlement did not include any fines/disgorgement.
Wait a minute--The last we read, Vinson was gainfully employed as a controller at a KFC. I guess the SEC can't work out some kind of payment plan?
| Permalink | Print Article | Back To Top |











Comments
The SEC did not impose penalties on Vinson and Normand because neither received any ill-gotten gain from their participation in the fraud, not because they couldn't pay.
Posted by: Kathryn | November 12, 2006 5:23 AM
I disagree--the SEC did not seek DISGORGEMENT from Vinson and Normand because neither received any ill-gotten gain from their participation in the fraud. However, according to the SEC litigation release, the reasoning for not imposing civil penalties (i.e., fines) was because of "their demonstrated inability to pay."
Posted by: Bruce Carton | November 13, 2006 11:48 AM