« "Paulson Committee" May Soon Recommend Dramatic Limits on Securities Class Actions | Main | Options Backdating Securities Class Actions: The List--Update »

Daily Posts

May 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

About SLW

Events

Subscribe

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

U.S. Code

Code of Federal Regulations

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Buried Notice Will Not Die

Let's put it this way. My company, ISS' Securities Class Action Services, has an entire business that focuses on researching and identifying new securities class actions. We have a team of people whose JOB is to research this stuff every day, 24X7. However, until today we did not have any record of a case filed October 2, 2006 against Forward Industries, which was the subject of a "notice" published to the class announcing the filing of the complaint. How is this possible?

Because the notice used was what many refer to as "buried notice," buried in the back pages of the Investors Business Daily. As I wrote almost two years ago,

Yes, the PSLRA does allow for notice by "widely circulated national business-oriented publication" or "wire service." As I have argued in the links above, however, (1) the industry standard in the year 2005 is to place such notices on a national business wire, and (2) there is no legitimate reason to deviate from this standard by providing "stealth" (but apparently legally adequate) notice through some random hard copy business publication such as IBD.

Two years later, this is even more true. Everyone who is interested in learning about securities class action filings monitors the wire services for announcements about such filings. No institutions or anyone else that I know of scans all of the "widely circulated national business-oriented publications" looking for random hardcopy announcements, nor should they be required to do so.

Comments

the class action firm - in the action Drago v. Sulja
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 07-60072-CIV-COOKE/BROWN

POSTED A "NOTICE" - HIDDEN - in investor's Business Daily, see ex. C attached to affidavit filed yesterday on pacer. This is completely unacceptable - even today this "notice" cannot be searched on the internet, nor can it be retrieved at the source cite - IBD.

CLASS ACTION FIRM BELOW -
VIANALE & VIANALE LLP
By: s/ Julie Prag Vianale
Julie Prag Vianale
Florida Bar No. 0184977
Kenneth J. Vianale
Florida Bar No. 0169668
2499 Glades Road, Suite 112
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Telephone: (561) 392-4750
Facsimile: (561) 392-4775
JVianale@Vianalelaw.com
DAVID R. CHASE, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 920-7779
Fax: (954) 923-5622
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/782

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group
The World Leader in Proxy Voting and Corporate Governance Services

Powered by Movable Type 3.36